Welcome
Hello
on the project „Foundation of Psychonomy“.
Foundation in two respects:
First, the argument that mainstream psychology is a pseudoscience and therefore a scientific psychonomy is necessary.
Second, the creation of the groundwork upon which psychonomy can emerge.
In addition to the problem of psychology being based on the dogmatic foundations of philosophy, which in turn is based on those of Catholicism, another problem is that terms are either assigned unsystematically, as in the case of „individual psychology,“ or that terms are assigned without filling them with content. As is the case with „clinical social psychology,“ for which a labeled box does exist – but so far, it has had virtually no content.
The same applies up to now to the word „psychonomy.“
The term was and is used in various ways and was originally coined by Werbik (1985), who, however, due to the methodological dispute that still prevails in psychology today, wanted it to be used to designate a second, more scientific direction within psychology. However, all criticism of and within psychology, all previous attempts at unification (unity of psychology), etc., have failed and continue to fail because they all took place and take place within the same dogmatic framework.
Only mytholysis , the dissolution of dogmas and myths, paves the way for a scientific psychonomy .
And this psychonomy not as a complement or extension, but as a contrast to non-scientific or pseudo-scientific psychology .
Just as there are still many people who believe in astrology despite astronomy, many who are avowed creationists despite the theory of evolution, biology and paleontology, many who trust in homeopathy despite physiology and medicine, and furthermore claim that their beliefs are scientific, so too in the future people will believe in
– the separation of immortal soul and earthly body,
– the CRAAM dogma of the always and only consciously , rationally and autonomously acting man, – the dogma of the body-less , culture-less and we-less ego,
– the mythomaniac statements of Freud,
– the constructs of megalomania and compulsive control of the behaviorists,
– …
The term „psychology“ is assigned to this field and its representatives.
By „psychonomy,“ however, I refer to the movement that continually strives to dispel myths and dogmas on a scientific basis, instead of continually creating new ones in arbitrary quantities. In this way, reality in its entirety (dogmatically and not fictionally in Vaihinger ’s sense) is ignored instead of being examined.
By psychonomy, I refer to the search for knowledge that could also be called “ ethological, cultural-historical social psychology .“ That is, one that recognizes and does not deny the continuity of human and animal origin, not only in the realm of biology but also of consciousness. That is aware of and researches the reciprocal influence of biology, culture, and social environment on the individual genesis of the ego.
And that exchanges the scientifically researched „new unconscious“ of social psychology (Bargh et al.) for the myths of Freud.
